主頁 高登熱話 吃喝玩樂 科技消費 名人專訪 短片
現有會員可[按此]登入。未成為會員可[按此]註冊。
[公司模式 - 關]  [懷舊模式 - 開
[Youtube 預覽 - 關]  [大字型]  [小字型]

您現在聚腳在 時事台內。

將已解封的舊帳戶升級高級會員

我們上年12月曾解封部分只輕微觸犯版規或懷疑被駭的帳戶,但有會員反映一些於2009年前登記的舊帳戶在解封後未有自動升級為高級會員,現在我們已將該批帳戶升級,謝謝。
精選文章
DeerGamer
New App Android IOS
高登主頁 » 討論區 » 時事台

Locked 此貼文已鎖,將不接受回覆。

跳至第

發起人
其實香港人接受到口罩係擋唔到肺炎未?
1001 個回應
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33762440/
Among pedestrians, the masking rate was 94.8%; 83.7% wore disposable surgical masks. However, 13.0% wore surgical masks incorrectly with 42.5% worn too low, exposing the nostrils or mouth; 35.5% worn 'inside-out' or 'upside-down'. Most online respondents believed in the efficacy of wearing face mask for protection (94.6%) and prevention of community spread (96.6%). Surprisingly, 78.9% reused their mask; more respondents obtained information from social media (65.9%) than from government websites (23.2%).

In Hong Kong, members of the population are motivated to wear masks and believe in the effectiveness of face masks against disease spread. However, a high mask reuse rate and errors in masking techniques were observed.Information on government websites should be enhanced and their accessibility should be improved.

係咪9戴呀, Hi Auntie宮久保[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

你呢個研究係去到2020 2月, 即係最初期唔夠罩所以答網上問卷話有重用都唔奇


喂 俾d志氣,J左十勁幾頁既研究原來引錯數據曲解結論,唔係唔回應咁男朋友下話[369] [369] [369]


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

要計到先可以引用?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]
你上面份香港report 貼下你點樣計條數黎睇過?#yup#


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33762440/
Among pedestrians, the masking rate was 94.8%; 83.7% wore disposable surgical masks. However, 13.0% wore surgical masks incorrectly with 42.5% worn too low, exposing the nostrils or mouth; 35.5% worn 'inside-out' or 'upside-down'. Most online respondents believed in the efficacy of wearing face mask for protection (94.6%) and prevention of community spread (96.6%). Surprisingly, 78.9% reused their mask; more respondents obtained information from social media (65.9%) than from government websites (23.2%).

In Hong Kong, members of the population are motivated to wear masks and believe in the effectiveness of face masks against disease spread. However, a high mask reuse rate and errors in masking techniques were observed.Information on government websites should be enhanced and their accessibility should be improved.

係咪9戴呀, Hi Auntie宮久保[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

你呢個研究係去到2020 2月, 即係最初期唔夠罩所以答網上問卷話有重用都唔奇

冇關係,個口罩嘅效力已經發揮唔到


搵到個summary大大把車勁條學棍教蝗[sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad]

https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/omuaruvh.d4zes3ke0fa.hfqxjvqnaq4.t2a.png

Hi Auntie人哋研究結果講decline in growth rate,你就想誤導人理解為 decline in infection risk #hehe# #hehe# 兩樣野根本唔同解讀方法你仲扮向左走向右走哂野撈埋黎講[369] [369] [369] [photo]

#yup#

#yup# 有排你玩呀城白狗 #yup#

#yup# 答未 #yup#


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

要計到先可以引用?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]
你上面份香港report 貼下你點樣計條數黎睇過?#yup#

咁扭曲咗啲乜嘢?


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33762440/
Among pedestrians, the masking rate was 94.8%; 83.7% wore disposable surgical masks. However, 13.0% wore surgical masks incorrectly with 42.5% worn too low, exposing the nostrils or mouth; 35.5% worn 'inside-out' or 'upside-down'. Most online respondents believed in the efficacy of wearing face mask for protection (94.6%) and prevention of community spread (96.6%). Surprisingly, 78.9% reused their mask; more respondents obtained information from social media (65.9%) than from government websites (23.2%).

In Hong Kong, members of the population are motivated to wear masks and believe in the effectiveness of face masks against disease spread. However, a high mask reuse rate and errors in masking techniques were observed.Information on government websites should be enhanced and their accessibility should be improved.

係咪9戴呀, Hi Auntie宮久保[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

答啦


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

要計到先可以引用?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]
你上面份香港report 貼下你點樣計條數黎睇過?#yup#

咁扭曲咗啲乜嘢?

淨係陳述局部事實唔係扭曲係乜??_?


喂 俾d志氣,J左十勁幾頁既研究原來引錯數據曲解結論,唔係唔回應咁男朋友下話[369] [369] [369]

廢柴城白狗賤勁格#yup# 人地咁辛苦做個研究出黎俾你亂勁引用扭曲事實#yup# 回應啦Hi Auntie#yup#


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

要計到先可以引用?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]
你上面份香港report 貼下你點樣計條數黎睇過?#yup#

咁扭曲咗啲乜嘢?

淨係陳述局部事實唔係扭曲係乜??_?
咁你淨係講%嚟做乜?


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

要計到先可以引用?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]
你上面份香港report 貼下你點樣計條數黎睇過?#yup#

咁扭曲咗啲乜嘢?

淨係陳述局部事實唔係扭曲係乜??_?
咁你淨係講%嚟做乜?

幾時?

教蝗:Van Duke et al話有冇強制戴口罩嘅分別係0.08同0.11

事實個研究係話:After the governor’s executive order, COVID-19 incidence (calculated as the 7-day rolling average number of new daily cases per 100,000 population) decreased (mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day; net decrease of 6%) among counties with a mask mandate (mandated counties) but continued to increase (mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day; net increase of 100%) among counties without a mask mandate (nonmandated counties).

The decrease in cases among mandated counties and the continued increase in cases in nonmandated counties adds to the evidence supporting the importance of wearing masks and implementing policies requiring their use to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (1–6).

-6% 同 +100% 咁大差別都俾你唔知特登定係弱智咁曲解到0.08同0.11黎誤導人,其他個十幾個又唔知俾你扭曲成點呢?Hi Auntie科學食屎喎
[369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369]


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33762440/
Among pedestrians, the masking rate was 94.8%; 83.7% wore disposable surgical masks. However, 13.0% wore surgical masks incorrectly with 42.5% worn too low, exposing the nostrils or mouth; 35.5% worn 'inside-out' or 'upside-down'. Most online respondents believed in the efficacy of wearing face mask for protection (94.6%) and prevention of community spread (96.6%). Surprisingly, 78.9% reused their mask; more respondents obtained information from social media (65.9%) than from government websites (23.2%).

In Hong Kong, members of the population are motivated to wear masks and believe in the effectiveness of face masks against disease spread. However, a high mask reuse rate and errors in masking techniques were observed.Information on government websites should be enhanced and their accessibility should be improved.

係咪9戴呀, Hi Auntie宮久保[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

答啦

自己啱啱講完9戴個效用差,點解唔答我呀?


教蝗:Van Duke et al話有冇強制戴口罩嘅分別係0.08同0.11

事實個研究係話:After the governor’s executive order, COVID-19 incidence (calculated as the 7-day rolling average number of new daily cases per 100,000 population) decreased (mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day; net decrease of 6%) among counties with a mask mandate (mandated counties) but continued to increase (mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day; net increase of 100%) among counties without a mask mandate (nonmandated counties).

The decrease in cases among mandated counties and the continued increase in cases in nonmandated counties adds to the evidence supporting the importance of wearing masks and implementing policies requiring their use to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (1–6).

-6% 同 +100% 咁大差別都俾你唔知特登定係弱智咁曲解到0.08同0.11黎誤導人,其他個十幾個又唔知俾你扭曲成點呢?Hi Auntie科學食屎喎
[369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369] [369]

答啦

自己啱啱講完9戴個效用差,點解唔答我呀?

答未?#yup# #yup#


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/tfo2ps3m.jldyh0zaif0.nn1wyonolsv.xrs.jpg
係咪咁認錯法?
但個數我cut 既咩?
認錯啦, 唔認就賤9格
我就見有人3番4次專登唔 bold
mean decrease of 0.08 cases per 100,000 per day
mean increase of 0.11 cases per 100,000 per day

[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

計唔到個%出嚟,你學咩人用呢份報告姐?你淨係用%咪就係扭曲囉[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

又唔bold[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]


又多一單[sosad] #yup#

教蝗:Brooks et al話7.5%

事實:https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/mtap1s4f.1ktptnbzqay.gxra3mj0abl.3ac.jpg

* To an aerosol of 0.1–7 μm potassium chloride particles (with 95% confidence intervals indicated by error bars) measured at mouthpiece of receiver headform configured face to face 6 ft from a source headform, with no ventilation and replicated 3 times. Mean improvements in cumulative exposures compared with no mask/no mask (i.e., no mask wearing, or 100% exposure) were as follows: unknotted medical procedure mask: no mask/mask = 7.5%, mask/no mask = 41.3%, mask/mask = 84.3%; double mask: no mask/mask = 83.0%, mask/no mask = 82.2%, mask/mask = 96.4%; knotted/tucked medical procedure mask: no mask/mask = 64.5%, mask/no mask = 62.9%, mask/mask = 95.9%.

淨係抽最細個粒數有咩用意呢可#hehe# #hehe# #hehe#

7.5%係講緊一個戴unknotted mask一個唔戴罩 vs 兩者唔戴罩,只係improve 7.5%#hehe# 即係只係印證左勁戴口罩既效用唔高,並唔係話戴口罩效用唔高,最底條bar正正講緊兩者戴好口罩係可以improve到95.9%#hehe#

有咩解釋呀又學棍科學食屎?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad]

答未#yup# [sosad]


喂 俾d志氣,J左十勁幾頁既研究原來引錯數據曲解結論,唔係唔回應咁男朋友下話[369] [369] [369]

廢柴城白狗賤勁格#yup# 人地咁辛苦做個研究出黎俾你亂勁引用扭曲事實#yup# 回應啦Hi Auntie#yup#

#yup# #yup# #yup#


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33762440/
Among pedestrians, the masking rate was 94.8%; 83.7% wore disposable surgical masks. However, 13.0% wore surgical masks incorrectly with 42.5% worn too low, exposing the nostrils or mouth; 35.5% worn 'inside-out' or 'upside-down'. Most online respondents believed in the efficacy of wearing face mask for protection (94.6%) and prevention of community spread (96.6%). Surprisingly, 78.9% reused their mask; more respondents obtained information from social media (65.9%) than from government websites (23.2%).

In Hong Kong, members of the population are motivated to wear masks and believe in the effectiveness of face masks against disease spread. However, a high mask reuse rate and errors in masking techniques were observed.Information on government websites should be enhanced and their accessibility should be improved.

係咪9戴呀, Hi Auntie宮久保[banghead] [banghead] [banghead]

你呢個研究係去到2020 2月, 即係最初期唔夠罩所以答網上問卷話有重用都唔奇

冇關係,個口罩嘅效力已經發揮唔到

同一班人之後再做研究

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.665708/ full

The low infection rate at the initial stage of outbreak may imply that the reuse of surgical masks in community settings is not as harmful as anticipated, and that the benefits of masking outweigh the risks of reusing masks.


答未#yup# #yup# #yup# #yup# #yup# #yup#


又搵多一單[sosad]

教蝗:Lyu and Wehby話0.9-2%

事實:佢所謂既0.9-2%又係扭曲左人地研究[sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad] Mandating face mask use in public is associated with a decline in the daily COVID-19 growth rate by 0.9, 1.1, 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0 percentage points in 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, and 21 or more days after state face mask orders were signed, respectively.

亦有人fc左:
But as we already explained, the study is not showing a decrease in the number of cases and deaths but a decrease in the growth rate of the daily cases and deaths.

“Because the growth rate is exponential,” the impact compounds, José Luis Jiménez, an analytical and atmospheric chemist at the University of Colorado Boulder who was not involved in the study, told us. “So, it’s kind of like your mortgage — you change your interest a little bit, and then you save a ton of money. Because the cases compound.”

Hi Auntie科學食屎真係讀食屎學位Z_Z [sosad]

黎黎黎#yup##yup#


嚴峻你答唔到可以退場架,留番俾當事人回應都得架[sosad] #yup#


搵人幫手quote俾教蝗睇[sosad] 條友block左我睇唔到[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]


搵人幫手quote俾教蝗睇[sosad] 條友block左我睇唔到[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]

佢咁鐘意搵錯處, 一定會解block睇, 最多睇完扮冇睇


又多一單[sosad] #yup#

教蝗:Brooks et al話7.5%

事實:https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/mtap1s4f.1ktptnbzqay.gxra3mj0abl.3ac.jpg

* To an aerosol of 0.1–7 μm potassium chloride particles (with 95% confidence intervals indicated by error bars) measured at mouthpiece of receiver headform configured face to face 6 ft from a source headform, with no ventilation and replicated 3 times. Mean improvements in cumulative exposures compared with no mask/no mask (i.e., no mask wearing, or 100% exposure) were as follows: unknotted medical procedure mask: no mask/mask = 7.5%, mask/no mask = 41.3%, mask/mask = 84.3%; double mask: no mask/mask = 83.0%, mask/no mask = 82.2%, mask/mask = 96.4%; knotted/tucked medical procedure mask: no mask/mask = 64.5%, mask/no mask = 62.9%, mask/mask = 95.9%.

淨係抽最細個粒數有咩用意呢可#hehe# #hehe# #hehe#

7.5%係講緊一個戴unknotted mask一個唔戴罩 vs 兩者唔戴罩,只係improve 7.5%#hehe# 即係只係印證左勁戴口罩既效用唔高,並唔係話戴口罩效用唔高,最底條bar正正講緊兩者戴好口罩係可以improve到95.9%#hehe#

有咩解釋呀又學棍科學食屎?[sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad] [sosad]

答未#yup# [sosad]

答未#yup#


嚴峻你答唔到可以退場架,留番俾當事人回應都得架[sosad] #yup#

Hi 你啦, 又話我敗走,
答我香港人算唔算9戴啦


跳至第

高登主頁 » 討論區 » 時事台

Locked 此貼文已鎖,將不接受回覆。



  快速回覆 - 輸入以下項目

本討論區現只接受會員張貼文章,本站會員請先登入。非會員人仕,您可以按此加入為新會員,費用全免,並可享用其他會員服務。


上次光臨時間: 29/11/2022 11:45
今天貼文總數: 533 | 累積文章數目: 7,077,325

聯絡我們 | 服務條款 | 私隱政策 | 廣告查詢 | 職位空缺
Copyright © 2022 HKGolden.com. All Rights Reserved.