主頁 高登熱話 吃喝玩樂 科技消費 名人專訪 短片
現有會員可[按此]登入。未成為會員可[按此]註冊。
[公司模式 - 關]  [懷舊模式 - 開
[Youtube 預覽 - 關]  [大字型]  [小字型]

您現在聚腳在 時事台內。

【再負荊請罪】全新高登官方app HKG正式上架 會員永久免廣告
是咁的,2016年年尾,我因為忽略會員對手機程式o既需求,做o左一個不明智o既決定,加上一直未有好好回應會員平日訴求,最終令唔少會員不滿。事件並唔單單影響我,亦影響一直以來熱愛高登o既每一名網民,為此再向各位表示衷心歉意。:-(

或者有巴打會講,寫好隻app自然會有人回家。我唔否認自己曾經都抱過呢種僥倖心態,但沉思過後,我明白其實只係寫好一隻app並不足夠,要為高登會員做o既事情實在太多,包括提升網速同改善伺服器穩定、維護自由o既討論空間、鼓勵會員參與創作及討論等。因為,高登最珍貴o既係每一位會員,所以落足心力滿足會員訴求係高登o既首要任務。 ......
精選文章
DeerGamer
New App Android IOS
跳至第

發起人
【突發】CNN:佐治亞洲確認拜登勝出該州總統選舉
107 個回應
香港堆種票夠係人手對啦
瘋骨你係咪覺得香港選舉好公正呀?


上面隻過氣老人信徒竟然都係信民主黨[sosad]
失望

似乎係你地唔肯承認選舉結果輸打贏要喎

睇定先啦清
咁快就跟班左翼風話選舉好清白[sosad]
而家起碼去到出年一月先知侵有冇料到
而且你認同班主流同埋fb twitter個d行為?唔係掛[sosad]

美國幾時變咗第三世界?
選舉不公只有第三世界先會發生

香港幾時變左第三世界?

香港不嬲係第三世界
你唔係話美國同香港同級呀?:o)

國際金融(洗黑錢)中心會係第三世界[sosad] [369] [369] [369]

返去讀多兩年屎片先黎獻醜啦

重要話不嬲都係第三世界, 傻的嗎,
唔同美國同級就第三世界:o)


香港堆種票夠係人手對啦
瘋骨你係咪覺得香港選舉好公正呀?

一屋幾十姓個d[sosad]


上面隻過氣老人信徒竟然都係信民主黨[sosad]
失望

似乎係你地唔肯承認選舉結果輸打贏要喎

睇定先啦清
咁快就跟班左翼風話選舉好清白[sosad]
而家起碼去到出年一月先知侵有冇料到
而且你認同班主流同埋fb twitter個d行為?唔係掛[sosad]

美國幾時變咗第三世界?
選舉不公只有第三世界先會發生

香港幾時變左第三世界?

香港不嬲係第三世界
你唔係話美國同香港同級呀?:o)

國際金融(洗黑錢)中心會係第三世界[sosad] [369] [369] [369]

返去讀多兩年屎片先黎獻醜啦

重要話不嬲都係第三世界, 傻的嗎,
唔同美國同級就第三世界:o)

哎喲,我都係想順你地意咋,原來踩香港又唔啱,見你地平日踩得咁開心:o)


香港堆種票夠係人手對啦
瘋骨你係咪覺得香港選舉好公正呀?

一屋幾十姓個d[sosad]

一屋幾十個姓 但係張票格式上無填錯 人手點票亦都無點錯 根據某啲人既邏輯呢啲票都係有效 重點一百次都唔會有分別


香港堆種票夠係人手對啦
瘋骨你係咪覺得香港選舉好公正呀?

一屋幾十姓個d[sosad]

一屋幾十個姓 但係張票格式上無填錯 人手點票亦都無點錯 根據某啲人既邏輯呢啲票都係有效 重點一百次都唔會有分別

呢個就係問題所在


香港堆種票夠係人手對啦
瘋骨你係咪覺得香港選舉好公正呀?

一屋幾十姓個d[sosad]

一屋幾十個姓 但係張票格式上無填錯 人手點票亦都無點錯 根據某啲人既邏輯呢啲票都係有效 重點一百次都唔會有分別

支那瘋骨邏輯[sosad] [banghead] #ass# xx(


燒山啱啱先講完反cup
點解會咁:~(
喬治亞係共和黨全面執政
唔係話無左一萬票, 定係話其實無計到


燒山啱啱先講完反cup
點解會咁:~(
喬治亞係共和黨全面執政
唔係話無左一萬票, 定係話其實無計到

核對左簽名未啫,講咁多?_?


除左大紀元以外所有媒體一律當fake news#bye#

傻的嗎 拎大紀元同其他媒體做比較[sosad]px [sosad]px


燒山啱啱先講完反cup
點解會咁:~(
喬治亞係共和黨全面執政
唔係話無左一萬票, 定係話其實無計到



其實真係比燒山燈死


瘋骨呢d人就係典型俾左翼洗腦
因為自己係移民/留學, 覺得民主黨同班左翼好幫到佢地
左翼畜牲最叻講好聽說話, 事實係點就[sosad]
民主黨呢d就更加啦O:-)

[sosad] [sosad] 瘋骨三藩市大一定啦,同埋D左膠政策應該未影響到佢住,反而受惠咁咪反Trump反上腦囉。不過咁,人地都支持香港民主運動的,但美國左膠囉Z_Z

之但係... Hi 你人地話要核對選票,你重點幾多次但核對有向左走向右走用咩。人地講緊呢個point你同我講乜規則共和黨訂。你依家唔核對選票我理得你咩黨訂。仲有11alive係NBC affiliated Atlanta本地台,咩方向大家心照,成日搵埋D link以為好back up到自己,根本就唔中point。人地要核實D選票啊,你核實真有其人冇假票你拜登多一百萬都冇人Hi。根向左走向右走本都唔啱logic ge. 仲有其他樓上有人講左費時重覆。


【鄧紫棋藝會突發】:
你下次個標題咁仲方便大家啦


CNN:o)

哦fake news?


美國Newsmax: Georgia佐治亞州點票結果重係uncertified[sosad] [sosad] [sosad]

好亂


人手點票又唔對簽名, 講左十幾萬次, 當聽唔到



重新點票係局黎


目的係做選舉公正嘅文宣

共和黨仲難贏過巴塞[sosad] [sosad]


CNN宜家無人睇無晒公信力啦, 仲報CNN:o)

要貼epoch times [sosad] [sosad]


CNN宜家無人睇無晒公信力啦, 仲報CNN:o)

要貼epoch times [sosad] [sosad]


Cnn報侵老婆要離婚一定好有公信力啦
依?唔知佢地有冇證據呢FC左未呢?


[quote][quote]
確實唔直接關民主黨,但就關Dominion,加上反侵既老派共和黨唔想咁多事過份更動結果,反正唔係親侵既茶黨一系

今次係人手點票, 唔係機點, Dominion又可以做到乜?
事實證明, 根據Georgia共和黨州務卿, 人手點同機點誤差最高係0.73%, 大部份county數字無變.
講Dominion乜乜SevenSeven, 連Rupert Murdoch旗下WSJ嗰班親共和黨嘅editorial board都出聲, 講明單嘢根本就係human error
https://www.wsj.com/articles/rage-against-the-voting-machine-11605656036
仲有, 呢個州務卿係兩年前當撈侵endorse佢去選㗎.
總之侵選輸就一定係有問題, 唔可以真係選輸[sosad] [banghead] [369]

人哋仲要連recount數字都upload上網任人睇
https://www.docdroid.net/ijyW68H/county-summary-data-pdf

1TRUMP當年ENDORSE既係現任州長(時任州務卿),唔係現任州務卿
2TRUMP當年係單方面ENDORESE佢,佢無喺選總統時ENDORSE返佢轉頭,但同時佢係呢件事上亦無話撐州務卿,純粹中立
3從來無試過重點票而翻過盤,可能有咩潛規則,見到有事都唔想搞大佢(至於有無民主黨/左派既作用力就唔評論),寧願隻眼開隻眼閉當一切正常,求其報返既數字顯示有做過野算,令侵系既宣稱顯得瘋狂


係香港突然關心美國啫

你知唔知 bush vs gore case?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

Florida 機數少咗
共和黨話唔畀數
之後法庭決定令 bush 贏咗

On December 8, the Florida Supreme Court had ordered a statewide recount of all undervotes, over 61,000 ballots that the vote tabulation machines had missed. The Bush campaign immediately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the decision and halt the recount. Justice Antonin Scalia, convinced that all the manual recounts being performed in Florida's counties were illegitimate, urged his colleagues to grant the stay immediately.[1] On December 9, the five conservative justices on the Court granted the stay for Bush, with Scalia citing "irreparable harm" that could befall Bush, as the recounts would cast "a needless and unjustified cloud" over Bush's legitimacy. In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that "counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreparable harm."[1] Oral arguments were scheduled for December 11.



是向左走向右走但啦
美國人自己揀 衰左唔好咸

Bidengret (悔登) is a thing.:)

https://imgur.com/HaXKSM5.png


https://upload.hkgolden.media/comment/0ylkdeiz.bwd2vrkr4cj.msnw3djvqxh.nim.jpg

:~(

羅氏油畫[sosad] #good#

唔明,咩meme?_?

Bob Ross, 一路畫一路講啲 motivate 嘅嘢

九十年代出過電視節目嘅畫家, 掃幾嘢油彩就畫成山林靚景嘅爆炸頭神人, 作畫旁述輕鬆積極
日本meme界天王之一. 已往生


CNN宜家無人睇無晒公信力啦, 仲報CNN:o)

要貼epoch times [sosad] [sosad]


Cnn報侵老婆要離婚一定好有公信力啦
依?唔知佢地有冇證據呢FC左未呢?

即刻潛水[sosad] [banghead] [369]


[quote][quote]
確實唔直接關民主黨,但就關Dominion,加上反侵既老派共和黨唔想咁多事過份更動結果,反正唔係親侵既茶黨一系

今次係人手點票, 唔係機點, Dominion又可以做到乜?
事實證明, 根據Georgia共和黨州務卿, 人手點同機點誤差最高係0.73%, 大部份county數字無變.
講Dominion乜乜SevenSeven, 連Rupert Murdoch旗下WSJ嗰班親共和黨嘅editorial board都出聲, 講明單嘢根本就係human error
https://www.wsj.com/articles/rage-against-the-voting-machine-11605656036
仲有, 呢個州務卿係兩年前當撈侵endorse佢去選㗎.
總之侵選輸就一定係有問題, 唔可以真係選輸[sosad] [banghead] [369]

人哋仲要連recount數字都upload上網任人睇
https://www.docdroid.net/ijyW68H/county-summary-data-pdf

1TRUMP當年ENDORSE既係現任州長(時任州務卿),唔係現任州務卿
2TRUMP當年係單方面ENDORESE佢,佢無喺選總統時ENDORSE返佢轉頭,但同時佢係呢件事上亦無話撐州務卿,純粹中立
3從來無試過重點票而翻過盤,可能有咩潛規則,見到有事都唔想搞大佢(至於有無民主黨/左派既作用力就唔評論),寧願隻眼開隻眼閉當一切正常,求其報返既數字顯示有做過野算,令侵系既宣稱顯得瘋狂


係香港突然關心美國啫

你知唔知 bush vs gore case?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

Florida 機數少咗
共和黨話唔畀數
之後法庭決定令 bush 贏咗

On December 8, the Florida Supreme Court had ordered a statewide recount of all undervotes, over 61,000 ballots that the vote tabulation machines had missed. The Bush campaign immediately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the decision and halt the recount. Justice Antonin Scalia, convinced that all the manual recounts being performed in Florida's counties were illegitimate, urged his colleagues to grant the stay immediately.[1] On December 9, the five conservative justices on the Court granted the stay for Bush, with Scalia citing "irreparable harm" that could befall Bush, as the recounts would cast "a needless and unjustified cloud" over Bush's legitimacy. In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that "counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreparable harm."[1] Oral arguments were scheduled for December 11.

作為選舉結果最接近既一次,點會唔知,但佢無改變結果

定你意思係,唔可以翻盤既潛規則(如有)之前係無,但因為呢次判決,所以之後就算有疑點D選務人員都唔會走去翻盤?


[quote][quote]
確實唔直接關民主黨,但就關Dominion,加上反侵既老派共和黨唔想咁多事過份更動結果,反正唔係親侵既茶黨一系

今次係人手點票, 唔係機點, Dominion又可以做到乜?
事實證明, 根據Georgia共和黨州務卿, 人手點同機點誤差最高係0.73%, 大部份county數字無變.
講Dominion乜乜SevenSeven, 連Rupert Murdoch旗下WSJ嗰班親共和黨嘅editorial board都出聲, 講明單嘢根本就係human error
https://www.wsj.com/articles/rage-against-the-voting-machine-11605656036
仲有, 呢個州務卿係兩年前當撈侵endorse佢去選㗎.
總之侵選輸就一定係有問題, 唔可以真係選輸[sosad] [banghead] [369]

人哋仲要連recount數字都upload上網任人睇
https://www.docdroid.net/ijyW68H/county-summary-data-pdf

1TRUMP當年ENDORSE既係現任州長(時任州務卿),唔係現任州務卿
2TRUMP當年係單方面ENDORESE佢,佢無喺選總統時ENDORSE返佢轉頭,但同時佢係呢件事上亦無話撐州務卿,純粹中立
3從來無試過重點票而翻過盤,可能有咩潛規則,見到有事都唔想搞大佢(至於有無民主黨/左派既作用力就唔評論),寧願隻眼開隻眼閉當一切正常,求其報返既數字顯示有做過野算,令侵系既宣稱顯得瘋狂


係香港突然關心美國啫

你知唔知 bush vs gore case?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

Florida 機數少咗
共和黨話唔畀數
之後法庭決定令 bush 贏咗

On December 8, the Florida Supreme Court had ordered a statewide recount of all undervotes, over 61,000 ballots that the vote tabulation machines had missed. The Bush campaign immediately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the decision and halt the recount. Justice Antonin Scalia, convinced that all the manual recounts being performed in Florida's counties were illegitimate, urged his colleagues to grant the stay immediately.[1] On December 9, the five conservative justices on the Court granted the stay for Bush, with Scalia citing "irreparable harm" that could befall Bush, as the recounts would cast "a needless and unjustified cloud" over Bush's legitimacy. In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that "counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreparable harm."[1] Oral arguments were scheduled for December 11.

作為選舉結果最接近既一次,點會唔知,但佢無改變結果

定你意思係,唔可以翻盤既潛規則(如有)之前係無,但因為呢次判決,所以之後就算有疑點D選務人員都唔會走去翻盤?

冇改變結果?
本來好大機會係gore 贏
結果條木7走去亂9打 iraq


CNN宜家無人睇無晒公信力啦, 仲報CNN:o)

要貼epoch times [sosad] [sosad]


Cnn報侵老婆要離婚一定好有公信力啦
依?唔知佢地有冇證據呢FC左未呢?

即刻潛水[sosad] [banghead] [369]

佢報導係話有former aide 話老婆想離婚
其實同trump 老婆朋友話應該唔會一樣咁學信

如果連呢啲咁簡單嘅 reading and critical thinking skill 都冇咁怪得會信大紀元


跳至第



  快速回覆 - 輸入以下項目

本討論區現只接受會員張貼文章,本站會員請先登入。非會員人仕,您可以按此加入為新會員,費用全免,並可享用其他會員服務。


上次光臨時間: 24/1/2021 14:19
今天貼文總數: 538 | 累積文章數目: 6,801,436

聯絡我們 | 服務條款 | 私隱政策 | 廣告查詢 | 職位空缺
Copyright © 2021 HKGolden.com. All Rights Reserved.