主頁 高登熱話 吃喝玩樂 科技消費 名人專訪 短片
現有會員可[按此]登入。未成為會員可[按此]註冊。
[公司模式 - 關]  [懷舊模式 - 開
[Youtube 預覽 - 關]  [大字型]  [小字型]

您現在聚腳在 時事台內。

有關解封部份帳號之事宜

早前收到各會員反映一些朋友的帳號可能因誤會導致被封,CEO與管理員團隊商討後,重新審核並決定解封部分只輕微觸犯版規、懷疑被駭的帳號。所有可得到解封的帳號(包括登入電郵及備用電郵)將會收到我們發出的通知,如有用戶收到電郵而未能正常重新登入,可以到「聯絡我們」(http://forum8.hkgolden.com/contactus.aspx)提供你用作註冊的電郵地址、後備電郵地址予我們跟進。

香港高登討論區管理員團隊
精選文章
DeerGamer
New App Android IOS
跳至第

發起人
點解歐美唔公開篤爆肺炎係生化武器?
47 個回應
證據呢?


仲要證據?
唔係人造武器可以咁廣泛傳染? 無病徵,無減退,無藥醫?
大自然唔存在呢啲病毒啦


而家黑警做野咩


但侵侵咀炮都唔Hi下呢下激氣
點解冇一個國家發下口水炮轟係生化武器?

樓主真係支那種嚟
對住自己唔 like 嘅人
連基本規矩都唔理
咁同支那勁噏有咩分別:o)

你用對付君子嘅方法去對付小人,蝕底嘅永遠都係自己


證據呢?


仲要證據?
唔係人造武器可以咁廣泛傳染? 無病徵,無減退,無藥醫?
大自然唔存在呢啲病毒啦


而家黑警做野咩


但侵侵咀炮都唔Hi下呢下激氣
點解冇一個國家發下口水炮轟係生化武器?

樓主真係支那種嚟
對住自己唔 like 嘅人
連基本規矩都唔理
咁同支那勁噏有咩分別:o)


合理估算喎,9up罵下有咩問題
支那都屈係美軍啦


之前咪有科學家證明左唔係人造囉
話有d受體係新款之前未見過
人類現有技術造唔到出黎

簡單黎講而家人只可以係現有病毒cut一段出黎移去第二隻病毒度
無能力做一段全新排列rna/dna


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9.pdf

補返條link
三版紙
想睇可以睇點解


之前咪有科學家證明左唔係人造囉
話有d受體係新款之前未見過
人類現有技術造唔到出黎

簡單黎講而家人只可以係現有病毒cut一段出黎移去第二隻病毒度
無能力做一段全新排列rna/dna


科學家唔夠voice,應該由各國領袖講,今次顯然係支研究病毒出車


O:-)


仲要證據?
唔係人造武器可以咁廣泛傳染? 無病徵,無減退,無藥醫?
大自然唔存在呢啲病毒啦


#good#

我呢排發夢耶穌講俾我聽:

- 2003 SARS死嘅全部華人 (大陸, 台灣, 香港, 加奈陀港燦移民), 一件鬼佬, 黑柴, 差哥以至隣近嘅架仔, 泡菜仔, 安南仔, 賓仔都冇

- 咁有針對性嘅病毒你話係天然定人為 ?

- 邊D人有動機搞岀嚟昭然若揭 (英美共濟會/Deep State ?)

- 共匪想覆啅鬼佬, 自己唔向左走向右走夠班就死螺法國總統席拉克同意設計BSL–4嘅武漢病毒研究所, 但秉承共匪冇口齒優良傳統, 收尾又反悔唔俾法國仔做工程, 搞到法國仔慶向左走向右走到彈起

- 共匪就以SARS為基礎加/減料搞件新病毒(武肺)出嚟 - 邱香果 (National Microbiology Lab (NML), Canada, 愛滋同伊波拉病毒專家) 去咗4次武漢所為何事其理自明, 最啓人疑竇嘅就係邱香果嘅老頂Francis Plummer, Scientific Director General, NML於4-2-20喺肯亞奈羅比開會期間”心臟病發”死亡

- 點向左走向右走知共匪成個體制無能兼混賬, 所以做乜嘢都會甩漏, 可能想喺武漢軍運會同香港放毒, 但因為新病毒(武肺)未完善未能成事, 但係未完善嘅新病毒(功能: 全方位華人基因免疫)就俾武漢病毒研究所石正麗條西婆D靚意外泄漏, 害到自己人仲害向左走向右走埋全世界


證據呢?


支那晨早已經銷毀左,堂堂大國唔可以無證劇下亂噏


鬼佬做野係慢D[sosad]


證據呢?


支那晨早已經銷毀左,堂堂大國唔可以無證劇下亂噏


9勁up有乜問題?吹向左走向右走漲呀?


#kill#


一個 "錢" 字 !


https://www.upmedia.mg/upload/article/20200129105024807380.jpg

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/sWDlq6Dtrh3CG21QJXqTtbYGLNsQIMke0mcx9VpiqJOEdpn9mMUeU6pcunFrg6cEupLnX8AZz1pTHye1LK2EXOSpv5c1dvl6BKJdPskUu8ykC5eAIQlDBYSTTJFz3nayJaHfpqo

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-xjrgXZl14/maxresdefault.jpg

https://static01-proxy.hket.com/res/v3/image/content/2620000/2621385/180420_1024.jpg

估計馬卡龍手握重要資訊 #yupsk#


因為無證據

其實袁國勇條line最穩
不過無人講


https://www.upmedia.mg/upload/article/20200129105024807380.jpg

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/sWDlq6Dtrh3CG21QJXqTtbYGLNsQIMke0mcx9VpiqJOEdpn9mMUeU6pcunFrg6cEupLnX8AZz1pTHye1LK2EXOSpv5c1dvl6BKJdPskUu8ykC5eAIQlDBYSTTJFz3nayJaHfpqo

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-xjrgXZl14/maxresdefault.jpg

https://static01-proxy.hket.com/res/v3/image/content/2620000/2621385/180420_1024.jpg

估計馬卡龍手握重要資訊 #yupsk#


https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1526228-20200515.htm?spTabChangeable=0

越來越有趣,腸下將來呢單野,有無可能迫到馬卡龍出野 #yupsk#


https://www.upmedia.mg/upload/article/20200129105024807380.jpg

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/sWDlq6Dtrh3CG21QJXqTtbYGLNsQIMke0mcx9VpiqJOEdpn9mMUeU6pcunFrg6cEupLnX8AZz1pTHye1LK2EXOSpv5c1dvl6BKJdPskUu8ykC5eAIQlDBYSTTJFz3nayJaHfpqo

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-xjrgXZl14/maxresdefault.jpg

https://static01-proxy.hket.com/res/v3/image/content/2620000/2621385/180420_1024.jpg

估計馬卡龍手握重要資訊 #yupsk#


https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1526228-20200515.htm?spTabChangeable=0

越來越有趣,腸下將來呢單野,有無可能迫到馬卡龍出野 #yupsk#

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iaI2emiynec/maxresdefault.jpg


https://m1.aboluowang.com/uploadfile/2019/1107/20191107061320640.jpg

搞搞下隨時係馬卡龍會令到發覺食呢隻驚世死貓

醒少少就快 d 爆漿,唔係隨時比 g 人先反咬就喊到無謂 [sosadsk]


:)


鏈住大陸個春袋慢慢玩唔好咩?...........[sosadsk]


而家點鏈法?起碼都要篤爆出嚟先鏈到㗎


鏈住大陸個春袋慢慢玩唔好咩?...........[sosadsk]


而家點鏈法?起碼都要篤爆出嚟先鏈到㗎

https://forumd.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=7231477


因為無證據

其實袁國勇條line最穩
不過無人講


唔信食野味。

同中國病毒SARS-CoV最拉近嘅蝙蝠病毒都冇furin cleavage site PPRARS|V。
https://upload.cc/i1/2020/05/16/gOy0pt.png

https://upload.cc/i1/2020/05/16/BYGoEn.png

“Examination of the protein sequence of the S glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 reveals the presence of a furin cleavage sequence (PRRARS|V). The CoV with the highest nucleotide sequence homology, isolated from a bat in Yunnan in 2013 (RaTG-13), does not have the furin cleavage sequence. Because furin proteases are abundant in the respiratory tract, it is possible that SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein is cleaved upon exit from epithelial cells and consequently can efficiently infect other cells. In contrast, the highly related bat CoV RaTG-13 does not have the furin cleavage site.”

“In wildlife, especially bats, a large number of coronaviruses that are closely related to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered over the past 20 years. However, so far an S1/S2 activation sequence that can be cleaved by furin has only been detected in SARS-CoV-2. "Wildlife sampling and the targeted search for coronaviruses with a focus on the S1/S2 activation sequence is necessary to identify those viruses that have the potential to infect and efficiently spread in humans.”


重有中國病毒近親,RaTG13蝙蝠病毒都應該係偽造。

石正麗科學大台如何圍威喂

Ok so we know scientists in China were making synthetic coronaviruses and inserting furin sites into them to make them more infectious. So why does zhengli Shi and her counterparts all over the world insist that covid19 is natural

B/c in January Shi conveniently published the sequence of a Sars like bat coronavirus that was allegedly catalogued in 2013. She has no physical sample of this virus & despite it being one of if not the most infectious strains of bat coronavirus, she waited 7 years to publish

This sequence is called RATG13 and Shi insists this virus is an ancestor of covid19, thus acting as a natural evolutionary pathway for covid19 to emerge

The sequence of RaTG13 is highly alarming – it clearly shows a potential of the virus to infect humans. Weird that Shi, the woman literally being blamed by many in the world for creating covid19, waited 7 years to share this sequence that is 96% identical to covid19.

Lucky for Shi, once she published this sequence it was used by the majority of scientists in their analysis as the basis to conclude that covid19 was naturally occurring

But recently scientists discovered she fucked up. The sequence of RATG13 has an error that points to it being a published fabricated sequence

When evolution takes place through random mutations, on average and under normal conditions, the ratio between the number of synonymous mutations and that of non-synonymous mutations through the whole length of a gene should be around 5:1.

for the same S2 region, between covid19 and RaTG13, there are a total of 90 nucleotide changes and only two amino acid mutations. Here, every 45 nucleotide changes correspond to one amino acid change. The synonymous/non-synonymous ratio is 44:1. Oops! That's weird and unnatural

https://twitter.com/DianeRo25123293/status/1260066054530711554?s=20


跳至第



  快速回覆 - 輸入以下項目

本討論區現只接受會員張貼文章,本站會員請先登入。非會員人仕,您可以按此加入為新會員,費用全免,並可享用其他會員服務。


上次光臨時間: 4/6/2020 3:25
今天貼文總數: 573 | 累積文章數目: 6,688,695

聯絡我們 | 服務條款 | 私隱政策 | 廣告查詢 | 職位空缺
Copyright © 2020 HKGolden.com. All Rights Reserved.