Spanberger 非常勇敢

歷史會給你一個公道

唔駛理 其他人 想什麼

洲長有權否決議案



DC 想VA 重劃區

Spanberger 根本反對, 被迫支持

地方最高法官否決左, 黨友仲提到 最高法院

輸左就算

https://www.facebook.com/LoudounGOP/videos/back-in-2019-abigail-spanberger-spoke-out-clearly-against-gerrymandering-she-und/1873541756517447/

Back in 2019, Abigail Spanberger spoke out clearly against gerrymandering. She understood then what every fair-minded Virginian knows—that drawing political maps to favor one side undermines the voice of the people. But today, she’s supporting the very kind of manipulation she once opposed. Why? Because this proposal isn’t about fairness—it’s about power. It shifts control away from voters and places it squarely in the hands of politicians, with the potential to turn a closely balanced 6–5 delegation into a lopsided 10–1 advantage for Democrats. That’s not reform. That’s a power grab—plain and simple.

就算共和黨重劃

吹到多幾多席, 我個人不太相信

攪咁多野, 隨時平手或1席每個洲

因為佢地用2024年 結果去推算

2026年相當利好民主黨

根本無須攪咁多野

Abigail Spanberger 我相信被迫

但 重劃投票 完左

見到 2025年大幅領先的票

在2026年大縮水

自己民望在VA 急插

所以, 要返自己

黨友極左的 政策要BAN

有利市民 的野要照行

人靚, 心善, 仲要有智慧

Abigail Spanberger 能力相當強

VA 洲 兩個參議員都好硬淨

唔會點輸

但如果我就咁睇

2026年, VA, 共和黨 有機會, 多一票, 眾議員

Virginia is allotted 11 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The current delegation is split between 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans

而家6對5, 民主黨6

但你見到經濟急插

經濟轉差, 你仲起度加稅

你地係唔係痴線

你知唔知, 1992年總統大選

1988年老布殊, 就係講唔加稅

最後加稅, 經濟差, 最後選唔到

VA 無得連任, 但過冷河, 再選可以



Virginia is the only U.S. state that limits its governor to a single four-year term in office. While there is no lifetime limit, the Constitution of Virginia strictly prohibits governors from serving consecutive terms. Former governors are permitted to run again, but only after sitting out at least one full term.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS1i5E5XWnI

EXCLUSIVE FaceTime with VA Governor Abigail Spanberger


I decided to FaceTime Abigail Spanberger to get answers to the concerns and frustrations so many Virginians have been raising directly from the source.

VA 洲長影響2026年

因為特朗普撻朵 VA 洲長極左

一上台加稅

Trump Asked About Virginia Tax Increase Proposals: 'What Do You Think About That?'


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x27CHRKJLss

眾議院輸緊

但參議員, 民主黨要贏4席, 其實唔易

眾議院輸緊

但參議員, 民主黨要贏4席, 其實唔易

係，難度比較高

Abigail Spanberger's stance on the conflict in Gaza and related accusations of genocide has centered on condemning the humanitarian crisis while avoiding the specific use of the term "genocide" to describe Israeli military actions.



Abigail Spanberger 起加沙問題上, 無講是屠殺

一般市民, 我認為, 可以認為是屠殺

因為 以色列不斷在炸醫院, 學校

市民接受到的 畫面, 就係你打死好多加沙好多人

老人, 婦主, 小孩,, 人道危機

唔夠水, 糧食, 藥物, 這是市民 接受的畫面

非常唔開胃, 以色列在 宣傳自己有幾成功

但你做洲長, 就要小心

你講錯野, 洲的人民, 就會出現文化, 立場對決的沖突

你講左 屠殺, 之後, 未來3年, 人人叫你解釋 是否屠殺

唔答最好 ,這是求生之道

Abigail Spanberger 起度救緊民主黨, 否決加稅

將 黨內的極左議程, stop

特朗普等緊Abigail Spanberger 犯錯

犯錯就係 將極左議程擺入VA

民主黨嘈Abigail Spanberger 很緊要

但 VA 是好多沉默的中間選民

劃區 民主黨只贏3% 左右


如果 一旦經濟轉差, 加稅, 2026年,

民主黨地方VA 議會同 眾議院會輸得好慘

現在有了輸的伏筆, 要立即取回主導 權

Abigail Spanberger 我認為做得好好, 挽救了 民主黨的選情

Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger issued over 30 vetoes during the legislative and reconvened sessions. Her tax- and fee-related vetoes specifically targeted measures that would have increased financial burdens on Virginians or expanded regional taxation.

Governor Spanberger vetoed or took action against several notable tax, fee, and related financial bills:

Regional Taxation & Service Fees: She declined to sign multiple local tax bills that would have authorized regional sales and use taxes, as well as new taxes on ride-sharing companies (Uber/Lyft), retail deliveries (DoorDash/Uber Eats), and commercial parking.

"Sleep Tax" Mattress Fee (HB 86): She vetoed legislation that would have established a statewide mattress recycling program, as it would have required a new fee passed directly on to consumers.

Cannabis Retail Framework (SB 391 / HB 1598): After the General Assembly rejected her proposed amendments—which included raising the proposed cannabis tax rate from \(6\%\) to \(8\%\)—she outright vetoed the bill to legalize retail recreational marijuana sales

BRIAN KEMP 是減緊稅

你走去加稅


美國喬治亞州州長布萊恩·坎普（Brian Kemp）在 2026 年 5 月簽署了一系列重大減稅與退稅法案，這是他任內推動的歷史性全面減稅政策，旨在減輕居民與企業的財務負擔。

1. 降低個人所得稅率 (HB 463)直接降稅：從 2026 納稅年度起，將該州統一的個人所得稅率由 5.19% 調降至 4.99%。逐年遞減：法案規定，只要州政府財政收入達到既定目標，未來每年將進一步調降 0.125%，目標在 2034 年前逐步將稅率降至 3.99%。提高標準扣除額：夫妻合併申報的標準扣除額從 24,000 美元提高至 30,000 美元；單身申報者則從 12,000 美元提高至 15,000 美元（同樣設有逐年調升機制）。免稅津貼：2026 至 2028 年間，符合條件的加班費和現金小費享有高達 1,750 美元的免稅額度。

2. 第四度全面發放剩餘物資退稅 (HB 1000)州長坎普於 2026 年 5 月 4 日宣佈，由於州政府財政預算維持盈餘，正式發放總額超過 10 億美元 的一次性特別退稅。符合報稅資格的居民可獲得：單身申報者：最高 250 美元。戶主申報者：最高 375 美元。夫妻合併申報者：最高 500 美元。

3. 房產稅改革與限制增幅 (SB 33)為了應對因房價暴漲導致地產稅飆升的問題，新簽署的法案將限制每年房屋評估價值的增長幅度，將增幅上限與通貨膨脹率掛鉤，避免居民（特別是固定收入的退休人士）因持有房屋而面臨無法負擔的稅項。

共和黨做洲長, 是做得較好

傾向減稅

但問題, 你要收入, 要好, 有財政盈餘先得

民主黨太 多垃圾開支

攪到要加稅

攪到玩死政府

當然 不少民主黨洲長 我認為做得好好

WISCONSIN

PA

WI

MI

以上洲長



洲長做得好

會帶動參議員選舉

因為洲長, 高調撐黨友

令中間選民 企邊

大部份 TONY EVERS

但有次我非常 不滿TONY EVERS , 建議法案判dean phillips無得選初選

Minnesota Congressman Dean Phillips and Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers clashed during the 2024 Democratic presidential primary when Phillips challenged the Wisconsin Elections Commission for leaving him off the state's ballot.

The Ballot Dispute: In early 2024, state Democratic leaders on the Presidential Preference Selection Committee excluded Phillips from Wisconsin's primary ballot, listing only Joe Biden.

Evers’ Stance: Governor Tony Evers, who was backing Biden's reelection bid, publicly criticized Phillips' subsequent lawsuit to get on the ballot, calling the challenge a "distraction" and "ridiculous".

The Resolution: Despite the pushback from Evers and state election officials, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Phillips, ordering that his name be placed on the April 2 primary ballot.

WI 最高法院 法官, 多數女性

但男與女, 不是太重要

最緊要公平, 公正

洲長, 不應發聲, 向法庭施壓

我對TONY EVERS 憤怒同遺憾 的事

就是以上一件事

WISCONSIN 算民主黨地盤

變左搖擺洲

點解要三權分立就係咁

我話知你特朗普乜水

最高法院法官都可以否定